Monday, October 10, 2011

13 Assassins: Seven Samurai, the short version

If there's something missing fromTakashi Miike's remake of 13 Assassins, it's the presence of common people. Its most obvious cinematic forebear, Akira Kurosawa's Seven Samurai, bursts at the seams with them, and passed down to its descendent films a sense that as a dying class within feudal Japan, samurai were their protectors. Kurosawa populated his pioneering samurai flicks with a sampling of farmers and merchants and fools; Miike deployed them symbolically to illustrate the distress the corrupt Shogunate has wrought.

Miike saves a lot of screen time by paying lip service to these peasants rather than giving them voices of their own. Depending on who you are, this is a trade-off that streamlines an already balanced, well-paced action-drama––or distinguishes a good film from the great film it could have been.

These representative commoners are few, and they're suffering: here, a woman bereft of her hands, feet and tongue, scrawling with a pen in her mouth that her whole family has been massacred; there, a little boy peeing unabashedly in the middle of a village that is about to be destroyed. They're bloody counterpoints to the silk kimonos and swept palaces of the nobility, and driving the movie is this dialectic between those who rule and those who serve.

It makes sense, then, that the movie is about politics. It begins when the violent nihilist son of the previous Shogun and younger brother of the current Shogun, Matsudaira Naritsugu, receives a promotion. A high-ranking government official, sensing that no good can come of this, recruits trusted samurai Shinzaemon to assassinate Naritsugu. Shinzaemon in turn recruits twelve other samurai to assist him. 

By nearly doubling Kurosawa's cast of samurai, Miike draws attention away from the beleaguered peasants and towards his warriors, who are a motley bunch indeed. Some fight for money, some for honor. Others fight for revenge. One fights because he has nothing better to do. The long peace that has reigned in Japan has rendered professional swordsmen almost obsolete, and thus samurai are men of noble birth who must eek out existences as common men: hybrids with a diminishing place in Japan's rigid social structure.

If there are problems with arranging a film like this, you wouldn't know it for all the swordplay. Coherent, smartly choreographed duels and battles help smooth the movie's plot hick-ups, and give it an almost epic gloss. The longest battle, at the end of the movie, is almost 40 minutes long and marred only by the running of some clumsily-animated CGI bulls. 

This last scene is exhausting to watch, and make fighting look like real work. Covered from head to foot in blood, sweat and grime, our heroes use guile and skill to destroy a small army, and the effort it takes 13 elite samurai to battle hundreds of semi-skilled warriors is enough to make you sweat in your seat. 

There's something cruel about watching this film in light of the recent nuclear power station catastrophe in Fukashima. Discipline, unity of purpose, and sacrifice pay off for Shinzaemon's samurai, and though many don't live to see it, it's implied that their efforts have contributed to the liberalization of the government and better living conditions for the people of Japan. But the nuclear age brought the meaning of our lives and efficacy of our efforts into question: 13 Assassins sometimes feels like a reminder of bygone days when pouring body and soul into a cause meant something. 

It's available on NetFlix Instant.

Sunday, October 9, 2011

My review: Attack the Block


[SPOILER ALERT]

The most stunning thing about Joe Cornish's Attack the Block is the final scene, when Moses, the head hood of a gang of London youths, is packed into the back of a police paddy wagon to the sound of grateful neighbors chanting his name. You're leaning forward in your chair almost far enough for the person in front of you to hear your breathing, and you're thinking what you would say as a character witness at his trial. At the beginning of the film, Moses (John Boyega) is a 15-year-old miscreant with a deep, angry stare protecting his vulnerability. In the final scene, that stare has transformed into the hard gaze of someone willing to sacrifice himself for the people he cares about. You almost forget about the aliens.

One of these aliens falls out of the sky, interrupting Moses and his gang of wannabe hoods as they mug Sam, a young nurse living in "the block," a high rise, low-rent apartment building in London. Moses and his posse chase down the alien to an abandoned building, where they beat it to death and haul it to a local pot peddler (Nick Frost) for safekeeping. Unbeknownst to all, this little act of street cruelty brings down a hail of aliens looking for their fallen brethren, and it's up to Moses' gang and its unlikely ally Sam to save the block while evading the police and a psychopathic small-time drug lord.

Cornish's characters have a loving reality worthy of a Calvin and Hobbes strip––and in a genre known for anything but realism. Moses' reluctance to apologize for robbing Sam has the power to make us blush: Who hasn't been in the position of being too proud to say, "I'm sorry"? Sam's skepticism at the boys' claim that they've been attacked by aliens has the look and feel of an adult's practiced disbelief in tall tales, and her surprise upon learning the truth as it crashes through her front door rings sincere. 

Moses is a stand-in for the talent and resources lost to the world through poverty. A brief glimpse at the flat he shares with his absentee uncle gravely replaces the obligatory scene in which the alien is finally revealed. Filth covers every available surface, and it's clear Moses sleeps under the same sheets he did in his now-distant childhood. It's difficult to imagine a person reaching adulthood amid such squalor and neglect becoming a contributing member of society. 

It's no accident that the destruction of Moses' flat is a decisive moment––one that made the audience in my hometown theater clap.

The aliens take a back seat to the people in the film by design. Vicious, furry, and black as midnight, they're regularly referred to as wolves, and their noisy, glowing green teeth are at first mistaken for eyes. Avoiding definition at every turn, everything known about them is at best a guess or approximation. Brewis, a pothead zoologist trapped with Moses and Sam, speculates that the aliens are attracted by the smell of their own blood, on the evidence that everyone they've killed has come into contact with a dead alien; he admits, however, that he is incredibly stoned and probably incorrect.

For a movie that addresses inner city poverty, hooliganism and responsibility, Attack the Block is free from ham-handed catharses and clumsy moralizing. Taking its cues more from Goonies than Alien, it has the humor and lightheartedness to make it a family favorite without sacrificing smartness and vitality. And with a production budget of $13 million, it proves that thoughtful direction and clever dialogue are effective substitutes for bloated special effects budgets. 

Wednesday, September 21, 2011

The intellectual perils of the Louis Vuitton condom

Sex sells, the mantra that has fed generations of creative ad types, is a principle so time-honored that it has become a mainstay of a quasi-Darwinian philosophy: "The purpose of any metric of success is to prove you're a worthy mate." Wealth and class, education, physical prowess––these things are indicative of a person's fitness. When the suggestive power of sex became known (or, alternatively, when psychoanalysis told us sex is an end unto itself), the obvious thing to do was find a way to make it sell shit.

And that's precisely what it has come to do. Sexy people shill everything from booze to auto parts, and sexual imagery is literally ubiquitous. So what happens in a world in which sex is so commodified that it becomes meaningless?

I present to you the $68 Louis Vuitton condom. Louis Vuitton's ultra-posh handbags and luggage just scream, "I'm classy and hang out in five-star French hotels, and that means I'm loaded." But one thing its aesthetic wasn't screaming was, "roll that oil stain-colored condom down your hard cock and fuck me." Now it is. The thing even has the raised letters LV along the side for her pleasure, and if your lady's the real deal, she'll be able to tell princess and the pea-style that you're both paying too much for a place to put your junk.

We should be cool with this. After all, it's an uncommon bloke who can blow that many shekels on a condom. He's good for a laugh. What tickles my brain is that Louis Vuitton is now using its brand to sell sex, rather than using sex to sell its brand. We're used to LV and Mercedes and Campari being the means to reach sex, which is seen as an end. What the LV condom has done is transform the cold, stand-offishness of class into an end for the means of loud, smelly, sweaty sex. Whether this tactic will work remains to be seen, but my guess is, Louis Vuitton will not come out well from this adventure.

PETA, which has lately taken to using sex to sell its animal-friendly activism, has given us another example of selling sex gone wrong. Recently it unveiled plans to create an erotica site, PETA.xxx, where sexual imagery will––and here's where I got lost––complement PETA's message. I'm assuming, since it would be unethical, that this isn't "fuzzy" or animal porn; it's probably pictures and videos of women, like, nibbling suggestively on carrots or something. 

What's worrisome is that PETA's product, what it's selling, is an ideology. We subscribe to ideologies because of our ideas of what the world should be like. Communists believe that through socialism, we can bring about a utopia. Fundamentalist Christians want to bring about the Apocalypse so they can go to Heaven. PETA believes that animals are treated cruelly, and the world will be a better place when people stop eating meat and kicking their dogs. But we don't see Lenin or Jesus surrounded by babes on propaganda or in churches. Except, maybe, on Bad Religion album covers.


"American Jesus"

It seems fitting, then, that many of PETA's more sexually-charged ads undermine their own sexuality with messages about animal cruelty.



Canada banned Pamela Anderson's PETA ad for literally comparing her to a piece of meat.

There's a good reason for why PETA has chosen this tack: Ideologies tend to be asexual, and their partisans see sex as part of the illusion of reality or network of deceptions from which they're trying to escape. Sex distracts us from the mission at hand. (If we weren't too busy screwing, we could, you know, save the whales or something.) 

PETA's strategy is pure cynicism. Sex has nothing to do with what it's selling; indeed, vegetarianism is a kind of abstinence. Like the Louis Vuitton condom, PETA has confused the kingdom of ends with the kingdom of means, albeit for radically different reasons. I'm not saying we shouldn't use sex to sell things. I'm just saying that perhaps we should re-evaluate the universality of the sex sells mantra.

Tuesday, September 20, 2011

Ramen noodles every night for a year

I don't like to watch television. The movies on AMC tonight are "King Arthur" and "We Were Soldiers"––neither of which I have any real interest in––and leave it to cable to make the 15 climactic minutes at the end of any film last a whole hour.

It dawned on me that there was something vaguely inappropriate about all these commercials, and I couldn't put my finger on what it was. After all, the parade of commercials for cell phone plans and insurance and decongestants hasn't changed significantly since I started watching television. Some still try to be funny, or ingratiating, or matter-of-fact. Hell, some of them are even good at being funny or ingratiating or matter-of-fact.

Listening to NPR this morning and hearing Diane Rehm (in her sultriest, old-beef-jerkey-I-found-between-the-couch-cushions voice) discuss the unemployment rate, I realized what it was that irked me so much about these advertisements: They really hadn't changed since I started watching television. Advertising executives haven't realized that nearly one in ten Americans doesn't have a job, and really is living on ramen noodles, like the chipper upstart Emily in this Allstate commercial.

"Emily's just starting out." I wish I was.

"Emily" is a stand-in for all us bright-eyed, bushy-tailed young folk who don't have a pot to piss in. Never mind the usual cues that she isn't "one of us"––that she's perfectly manicured, that she drives a new car––; what Emily's missing is the look of someone who has somewhere to be. So like an unemployed person living out of her parents' basement, she has the trappings of a workaday jane, but is obviously not really "just starting out." She's stagnating, only she's doing it with an idiot smile on her face.

I would love to see an advertisement on TV telling me a company is hiring people, and that labor is urgently needed. It's a pie-in-the-sky idea, but I think a commercial like that would indicate that a new reality is sinking in. A lot of Americans aren't thinking about how they can save big on their cell phone bills by switching carriers. We're thinking about what we can cut from our budgets. That's how scarce money is. It's a scarcity that we don't see anywhere on television, and if one were to sit on one's couch all day long and watch sitcoms and advertisements, one might never grasp how dire the job and money situation really is.

I wish I had Emily's problems. It would be awesome to move out of the basement and starve a little, as long as I had places to be and things to get done. But apart from Liz Lemon on "30 Rock" and a few rare others, television is populated with people who have no ambition––people who viewers never see working, or changing diapers, or even cleaning their immaculate Manhattan lofts. 

It's disappointing because America is ripe for someone to produce commercials and television shows about the real drama of finding and keeping work.

Thursday, September 15, 2011

Books on a desert island

Over the last few weeks, I've had a few small successes in my search for a job: I scored at interview for the business editor at one paper; I've made the "first cut" for a reporter position at another. Morale is high.

But the logistics of moving frighten me. I've moved before and I know what a hassle it is. I need a car and a way to transport my bikes. Money is also an issue. To distract myself from these and other considerations, I've begun to populate an empty bookshelf with the choicest titles from my extensive collection that I absolutely couldn't do without wherever my job hunt takes me. So, what books will I take with me to my "desert island?"

There are a few titles that come instantly to mind.

  • Herodotus, Histories
  • Stephen Bloom, Postville
  • Vladimir Nabokov, Ada, or Ardor
  • Richard Wilbur, Collected Poems
  • Arthur Clarke, 2001 A Space Odyssey
  • R.D. Laing, The Divided Self
  • Richard White, The Organic Machine
This list includes two novels, two historical surveys, a "place biography" and a book of poetry. What surprises me about it is its relative obscurity. When I walk into someone's home or office for the first time, I'm immediately drawn to the bookshelves, where I feel most comfortable acquainting myself with my host's tastes. This list would tell a guest of mine very little about me, and I'm torn between interpreting this feeling as meaning there are too few books on it, or these books are unrepresentative of my interests.

When someone asks me what book (or album) I'd take to a desert island, my answer, I've realized, has much to do with what I want the asker to hear as my own opinion. I wrote my undergraduate thesis about Virginia Woolf: Will I take any of her books with me? What about Russian and graphic novels? Gödel, Escher, Bach? Nietzsche? Or does including these books unite me with my past interests more than with what I'm likely to read?

Perhaps a more complete list (added to the list above) would look more like this:


  • Hermione Lee, Virginia Woolf
  • Virginia Woolf, Between the Acts; The YearsMoments of Being
  • Leo Tolstoy, War and Peace; The Death of Ivan Ilyich and Other Stories
  • John Barth, The Sot-Weed Factor; Lost in the Funhouse
  • Fyodor Dostoyevsky, The Brothers Karamazov, Demons, The Idiot
  • Roald Dahl, Roald Dahl Omnibus
  • Douglas Hofstadter, Gödel, Escher, Bach
  • Howard Zinn, A People's History of the United States
  • Neil Gaiman, Sandman
  • Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, Cancer Ward
  • Associated Press, AP Stylebook 2009
There. I've more than doubled the number of books I'll be taking with me, along with, like, all my clothes, electronic gadgetry, bikes, tools, etc. It remains, considering the hundreds of books I've read and have stowed in my room, a tight list. I hope to keep it tight.

In the meantime, I'd be interested in finding out what books you, dear reader, would take to your own desert island.

Saturday, August 6, 2011

Rise of the Planet of the Apes: We put these monkeys in a room with some typewriters, and they hammered out this film script.

In the beginning of William Faulkner's short story "Was," Tomey's Turl, a house slave, escapes his master's homestead to visit his common-law wife, the slave of a neighboring landowner. Thus begins a merry little manhunt that ends in Tomey's Turl dealing poker hands that will determine he and his wife's fate to two childless slaveowners.

Both Tomey's Turl in "Was" and the ape Caesar in Rise of the Planet of the Apes are bonded characters that lead their masters on steeplechases that explore and expose moral positions and leave former slaves holding all the cards. The apes prove their humanity while humans prove their complacency, incompetence, and hubris. But despite its lofty aspirations, this latest installment of the Planet of the Apes series lacks the emotional realism that was the hallmark of its finer predecessors. We know that one day, the apes will inherit the world; we just don't know how until the end of the story, when more screen time is dedicated to foreshadowing a sequel than to character or plot development.

[SPOILER ALERT] Caesar, a hyper-intelligent ape in the care of scientist Dr. Will Rodman (James Franco), finds himself in a primate house managed by John Landon (Brian Cox) and his son Dodge (Tom Felton) after Caesar becomes violent when a neighbor threatens Dr. Rodman's Alzheimer's-stricken father Charles (John Lithgow). When he learns to escape the simian sanctuary, Caesar absconds with- and deploys on- his fellow apes a virally-delivered gene therapy Dr. Rodman has developed and desperately tested on his father. The therapy, which imbues apes with human-like intelligence that allows them to revolt against their human captors and escape to the Redwood Forest, is fatal to humans: In a closing scene, an infected pilot boards an internationally-bound flight.

Rise of the Planet of the Apes is full of allusions to everything from Shakespeare's "Julius Caesar" to Joseph Stalin and the Russian Revolution, to 12 Monkeys, to fascism, but these allusions are only half-realized. Caesar turning a single stick into a fasces to demonstrate the power of cooperation flirts with the cult of leadership, but never materializes into totalitarianism; the ruthless, scar-faced ape Koba (a nickname of Stalin's) never betrays the kindly (if rebellious) Caesar, and inter-ape political intrigue and instability are dismissed with the promise of a utopia among the redwoods.

All the danger and tragedy that could have made this film interesting have been left offscreen, presumably to make Rise of the Planet of the Apes palatable to the generalist of audiences. Caesar's transition from pharm lab Frankenstein to dedicated revolutionary is murky, and in the reality of the film, intelligence and emotional maturity are ludicrously interchangeable. Dr. Rodman's desperate and unethical experimentation on his father is similarly devoid of emotional complexity, and his romance with zoo vet Caroline (Frieda Pinto) is eerily un-intimate during its five-year course.

Franco's and Lithgow's performances suggest vital, vulnerable characters, but the juiciest moments of rumination and dialogue were left on the cutting room floor. Lithgow's portrayal of Alzheimer's derives its force from an amazing reserve of intelligence and empathy, and in scenes that aspire to little more than the mere telling of his character's condition, Lithgow demonstrates an ability to show.

Had this movie not attempted to take intellectual high ground and spent less time bracing audiences for a follow-up film, it could have been much bolder than it is. Instead, it's another example of studios capitalizing on already-established franchises, big-name actors and stock stories to fill a parade of the uncannily familiar and blandly wholesome.

Sunday, July 17, 2011

Eugene, Part II

Her name is Jonnie Burns. In her photo on page A6 of the Idaho Statesman, she wears a black tank top and blue jeans, and props up a fat baby with her right hand. If you look closely, you can see hallmark Idahoan features: her sun-browned skin set against her squinting blue eyes. Her legs are muscular and thick. On her feet are a pair of huge, dirty workman's boots. The house behind her needs new paint and some carpentry around the windows.

The caption under the photo says she works for her mother getting rid of gophers in Homedale, a town of about 2,500 residents that got its name when it was drawn out of a hat.

Jonnie Burns' is a weird job, but the look on her face tells me she doesn't think so. It's a different kind of weird than running a head shop in Eugene, where everything is an euphemism for weed. It's the rare bird that smokes tobacco out of a four foot tall "water pipe" with a marijuana leaf etched onto its chamber.

I can't imagine her telling her friends "I kill gophers for a living" with the same wink and nod as the chipper blonde behind the counter of this particular head shop located just off the University of Oregon campus. She told me a story about an especially elaborate, salmon-colored bubbler that reminded me of the synaptic network of a human brain.

"The artist was here, and offered it to a girl for $300, which is way less than what it's worth, but she didn't buy it," she told me. She explained that while it was a beautiful bubbler and an original work of art, and that the girl was flattered the artist had offered her a sweet deal, $300 was still more than she could afford.

It occurred to me that the girl behind the counter may have been the girl from her story.

Ian, whose meeting with a project collaborator from out of town had given me the morning and most of the afternoon to snoop around downtown Eugene, spied me from across the street as I left the head shop. He waved and called out my name.

We found ourselves at McMenamin's, a distinctly Oregonian pub chain where I sometimes ate as a child. (My dad's office was across a parking lot from the first Portland location.) Ian snickered as we passed the table at which we ate the last time we ate there. It was situated between the doors to the men's and women's bathrooms.

We settled at a bench on a shady back patio. On the bench to my left, a tatted-up bald man talked incessantly about the broadening effects of travel; at another sat a growing group of physics students whom Ian chucklingly derided as "novices" when one of them complained about a programming language. Ian's derision reminded me of first-year journalism students obsessing prematurely over their master's projects.

The air was still on the patio, and the heavy, sweet smell of brewing beer hung in the air like dew, which seemed to delight Ian. I imagined that the tables were sticky with muggy, sugary air. We ordered beers, over-seasoned Cajun tater tots, and for my lunch, a pulled pork sandwich.

Since Thursday, I'd obsessed over the proper pronunciation of the word "Boise." Is it "boy-see," or "boy-zee?" Ian responded to my musing out loud, telling me he couldn't hear the difference. I later consulted an expert on the subject––my cousin Carley––who informed me in no uncertain terms that it's pronounced "boy-see." My sandwich safely in my stomach, our conversation dwindled, and we decided on a change of scenery. We paid the bill, and walked to the physics building.

The University of Oregon's Willamette Atrium, which houses the physics department where Ian works, looks like a refurbished gothic ruin. Its wraparound offices and classrooms enclose a cavernous interior doused in natural light from massive windows, and a high ceiling with exposed supports. Ian's office is in the basement, far from the distractions of natural beauty.

The basement workspace where Ian and his colleagues conduct their experiments is at the end of a hallway, where offices and labs cluster around a common area with a cumbersomely positioned desk, a whiteboard, and a few examples of the furniture one commonly finds in a university setting. It looked almost like a scene from a play.

Ian gave me a brief tour. In one of the labs, he showed me a few products of a machine that creates black and white drip paintings. Some of them I would have been proud to have on my own wall. In the same lab, I was drawn to a huge canister, probably two feet in diameter, sunk in the floor, containing a supercooled gas used in optics experiments. Hanging in the rafters was what appeared to be a paper maché worm, a ghost of grad students past.

But what interested me most was a map of the United States that had been put up in an obscure corner. The distance I flew the day before was worth pondering.

My tour was cut short by a long-haired man who called to Ian from the top of the staircase that ended in the cluster's common area. He beckoned at Ian using his whole arm in a gesture I couldn't quite read. The identity of the long-haired man remains a mystery to me, but if I had to guess, I'd speculate that he was either a professor or the aforementioned collaborator himself. Ian disappeared up the stairs, and I sat at one of the university-type chairs to read.

Time did not fly.

In my book was a story about unrequited love and/or star-crossed lovers that ended in what seemed to me to be a particularly Idahoan fashion, taking place near the Salmon River in Idaho in the 1880s. A man who ran a booming business in a small mining town fell in love with a married woman. When the woman was mysteriously widowed, the business owner paid for her husband's funeral, and the businessman and the widow lived happily together for two years. In the second year, a third gentleman entered the picture, and the woman married the newcomer. A year later, both husband and wife were found shot to death in their home. The business owner paid for both of their funerals, let his business lapse, and became a loner in the hills. Later, miners found his decomposed body in his cabin, and in his hands he clutched a photo of the deceased widow.

When Ian returned, it was almost time for dinner. We climbed the stairs, walked through the atrium, and made our way to Taylor's, a pub that was simply too close to campus to be worth going to during the school year, to meet some of the other physics graduate students.

We found several of Ian's colleagues already there, including an incredibly awkward but sincere Indian and a tall, chubby, bearded man who had buzzed the sides of his hair and drawn the long strands on the top into a tight, shiny ponytail. Insanely shrewd flies buzzed all around.

More people showed up: Wes, the wiry, curly-headed fast-talker I met last year; two girls, one of whom chatted boisterously; an attractive couple. In the meantime, our flirtatious waitress brought me my beer and chicken pot pie.

The long table on the patio at which we sat split between two conversations. Ian, Wess, and the couple talked shop, while the rest of us probed my irrational dislike of the state of Colorado. Finishing our dinners, we went inside to play pool and shuffleboard in the back room, where Spanish-language news, with its too-attractive anchors and sex-charged soap opera commercials, played on televisions mounted from the ceiling.

I've always felt unobservant; it seems I always miss something important. While I talked with Wes about an injury he'd sustained to his elbow, Ian suggested that we invite a few people back to his apartment for drinks. I found out later that one of his former romantic interests, now dating one of his colleagues, showed up at Taylor's and had made staying at the bar uncomfortable.

We left Taylor's with one of Ian's friends, a short, Nepalese version of Snooki from 'Jersey Shore' named Martha who made every effort to communicate that she despised me.

On the way, we were intercepted by the soft-spoken couple we met at Taylor's. They absconded with Martha, who ended up buying a $3 avocado at a grocery store, while Ian and I tiredly made our way back to his apartment to wait for Martha et al.

The rest of the night went by in a hurry. Martha complained bitterly about her $3 avocado, fumbling at it, evidently with the intention of eating after she'd penetrated its plastic-looking skin. Once she'd halved the fruit, she stared blankly at the pit until someone hacked it with a knife and drew the pit out. "What the hell are you doing?" Martha cried.

That evening, I held my tongue while Martha alternated between laughing hysterically at the words "Tamil Tiger," and throwing everything I said back in my face. At one point, sitting on Ian's crowded couch and drinking red wine, she looked me straight in the eye and told me I wasn't funny.

In a moment reminiscent of that scene in True Lies in which Arnold Schwarzenegger contemplates wrecking the used care salesman Bill Paxton's face, I thought about giving Martha a what-for: "That's nice, you yak shit-eating Sherpa. Keep running your mouth and I'll put you in the common grave where the University of Oregon puts the diversity admits that just didn't work out."

But that isn't what happened. I just gave her a cold stare until she looked away. I'm not much for tact, but I didn't want to put Ian in a weird position, and I wasn't going to run my mouth at someone bent on being a bully. At that point in the night, I would have given just about anything to get her to stop talking.

Everybody left. Meeting too many new people after a full day of walking and reading and face-time with Ian had exhausted me. Ian was exhausted too, I think. We watched an episode of '30 Rock' and went to bed: We were going to the Country Fair the next morning bright and early, and we needed as much sleep as we could get.